How the team works
Engineers inside your team, not a statement of work.
A small unit that sits in your standups, builds on your systems, and is structured so that ownership transfers rather than being promised. It is the same structure that produced the numbers on our about page.
Four people, and each seat is a decision.
The POD
1
Lead
Owns the domain end to end and the relationship with your side.
1
Product owner
Holds the business logic and decides what an agent may never do.
2
Full-stack AI developers
Build, evaluate and ship the agents themselves.
Deliberately small: it covers business delivery and product direction in one unit rather than staffing engineers and hoping ownership emerges. Small enough to hold context, large enough to ship without waiting on anyone.
Layer 01
Where the POD sits.
We deploy the POD operating model into your team, working on your systems and your rules to unlock the organizational intelligence you already have. Your people learn the framework while it is being built. By the end they are building the next agent on it themselves.
How it operates.
In your standups, on your tickets
Same board, same rituals, same definition of done. You see progress the way you see your own team's, not in a fortnightly status call.
Paired, not siloed
Your engineers sit with ours from the first sprint. The knowledge transfer is the work, not a document produced at the end of it.
The engagement is designed to end
Step four exists so you outgrow us. We would rather hand over than hold a retainer nobody can justify.
Why the product owner is not optional.
The common failure is staffing engineers against a workflow nobody has authority over. The engineers build what they were told, the exceptions turn out to be forty percent of volume, and there is no one in the room who can decide which of those exceptions the agent is allowed to handle and which must stop at a person.
The product owner is that decision. They hold the pricing, routing, approval and escalation logic that makes your operation yours, and they are the reason the agent ends up shaped like your business rather than like a template.
That logic stays yours. We do not take it to the next client, and it is not the basis of a product we sell back to your competitors.
What transfer actually looks like.
Ownership does not transfer in a meeting at the end. It transfers in stages, and each one is visible while it is happening.
01
We build, you watch
First agent. Your engineers are in the sprint and on the pull requests, but the delivery risk is ours.
02
We build together
Second agent. Your engineers take components. Ours review rather than write, and the evaluation harnesses become the shared language.
03
You build, we review
Third agent is yours end to end. We are on call for the parts that break in ways nobody has seen yet.
04
You build
The POD structure is installed with a hiring profile against each seat, the runbooks are written, and you should not need us to change a prompt.
Bring us one workflow.
Thirty minutes, no deck. Pick the process that costs you most in people, errors or delay, and we'll pressure-test whether an agent is genuinely the right answer for it.
- An honest read on whether that workflow is a good agent candidate
- What the first deployment would involve, and roughly what it costs
- An honest answer if the sequencing is wrong and you should fix something else first